Short commentary
Space exploration has always captured the imagination of humanity, and as our ambitions extend further into the cosmos, the
need for comprehensive medical care during long-duration space
missions becomes increasingly important [1]. New manned missions targeting destinations beyond Low Earth Orbit, such as Mars
and extended stays on Gateway, the new International Space Station around the Moon, poses a unique set of challenges to the
health and well-being of crew members. Recently, European and
Japanese Spatial Agencies has chosen their new astronaut candidates. The European selection process renews its astronaut team
every 15 years, so we expect the new group to face long manned
Space Missions. From more than 22,500 applicants from across its
Member States, only three of the selected candidates are Doctors
of Medicine, and only two are specialized in surgery.
Identifying a suitable candidate for the role of a surgeon astronaut requires a rigorous selection process. The candidate must
possess both exceptional surgical skills and the physical and mental aptitude for space travel. However, the current situation is
quite surprising, as far as it has been widely recognized that having surgeon astronauts as part of the crew becomes a critical component to long manned space missions’ success [2], all the rest
of selected candidates are engineers without medical knowledge.
The Deep Space environment is quite hostile for human body.
Microgravity, ionizing radiation exposure and the isolated environment of a small spacecraft are three of the most significant
factors which degrade our physiology [3]. Prolonged exposure to
microgravity results in a myriad of physiological changes, including bone density loss, muscle atrophy, and cardiovascular deconditioning, which have been well-documented in astronauts during
long-duration spaceflights in the present-day International Space
Station [4,5]. Fluid management, wound closure, and infection
control are further complicated by the lack of gravity. Space radiation poses a significant risk to astronaut health, leading to an
increased likelihood of cancer, central nervous system damage,
and degenerative tissue disorders [6]. Furthermore, the risk of
traumatic injuries, such as lacerations or fractures, increases in
the confined and hazardous environment of a spacecraft [7].
On a space mission, the distance between the spacecraft and
Earth may be too great to receive real-time guidance and assistance from surgeons and medical specialists on Earth because of
communication latency (which can be longer than 20 min from
Mars to Earth). This means that astronauts would have to be able
to perform complex medical procedures (like surgeries) on their
own.
Additionally, the psychological stressors associated with isolation, confinement, and demanding work schedules in long-duration missions can lead to mental health issues, including depres-
sion, anxiety, and interpersonal conflicts [8]. These physical and
psychological need medical explorations and a correct treatment
in order to address both acute and chronic health issues that may
arise during the mission.
The duration of a Mars mission, which could last up to 3 years,
dramatically increases the likelihood of medical emergencies.
The inclusion of a surgeon astronaut in the crew of long-duration
space missions offers several advantages.
First, their presence ensures timely and appropriate medical
intervention in case of emergencies, reducing the risk of severe
complications or fatalities [9]. Immediate access to surgical expertise increases the chances of successful treatment, particularly for
conditions that require prompt intervention, such as appendicitis or traumatic injuries [10]. A surgeon astronaut also minimizes
the risk of complications and the need for an emergency return
to Earth [11]. This is particularly important for missions targeting
destinations such as Mars, where the time and resources required
to evacuate an injured or ill astronaut back to Earth would be prohibitive [2].
Second, a surgeon astronaut can monitor and address the
physiological changes induced by microgravity and radiation exposure, mitigating potential long-term health consequences [12].
By closely monitoring astronaut health and implementing countermeasures, such as tailored exercise programs and pharmacological interventions, a surgeon astronaut can help maintain crew
health and mission performance [13]. Wound healing in microgravity may be slower, necessitating vigilant monitoring and infection control measures. Rehabilitation may require creative solutions, such as the use of resistance bands and specialized exercise
equipment. Besides, a surgeon astronaut can contribute to the
development of novel medical procedures and techniques specifically tailored for the space environment [14]. The unique environment of space necessitates the adaptation of conventional
surgical techniques to accommodate the challenges of microgravity, such as the control of blood and body fluids, and the management of floating surgical instruments [2]. The knowledge gained
by surgeon astronauts during long-duration space missions can
inform the development of improved medical care for future
space explorers.
Third, a surgeon astronaut can contribute to the psychological
well-being of the crew by providing mental health support and
fostering a sense of safety and security. The psychological benefits of having a dedicated medical professional on board should
not be underestimated, as they can contribute to a more cohesive
and resilient team [8].
Despite the advantages, incorporating a surgeon astronaut
into the crew of a long-duration space mission presents several
challenges for Space Agencies. The rigorous training required
for an individual to excel as both a surgeon and an astronaut demands a significant investment of time and resources [13]. The
surgical skills required to provide comprehensive medical care
during space missions are extensive and must be maintained
through ongoing practice and training [15]. This mixed training
can be tough for the candidate, given the competing demands
on an astronaut’s time, both during the pre-launch training phase
and while in space [16].
The limited crew size on long-duration missions necessitate
that all astronauts serve multiple roles when participating in
the broader mission objectives [12]. A surgeon astronaut must
therefore possess not only medical expertise but also the ability to contribute to other mission-critical tasks, such as research,
maintenance, and extravehicular activities. This multifaceted role
requires a unique skill set and adaptability that may be difficult to
find in a single individual.
Space constraints on a hypothetical Mars-bound spacecraft
limit the available medical supplies and equipment. The fixed provision of medical care in the space environment presents logistical
challenges, including limitations in medical equipment and supplies due to mass, volume, and power constraints [9]. Developing
surgical techniques and tools that are both effective and compatible with the exceptional conditions of space travel remains an
ongoing area of research and development, which may require
innovative solutions and improvisation during medical emergencies [2]. Furthermore, the psychological stressors associated with
long-duration space missions, such as isolation, confinement, and
disrupted circadian rhythms, may impact the ability of a surgeon
astronaut to perform optimally in high-pressure medical situations [17].
Conclusion
TNext long-duration manned space missions challenges underscore the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration between
the medical and space exploration communities. By addressing
these complexities and developing innovative solutions, the inclusion of surgeon astronauts in future missions will play a crucial
role by enhancing crew health, safety, and mission success. Further research and technological advancements will be essential in
ensuring that surgeon astronauts can effectively meet the unique
demands of their role in the Deep Space environment.
Declarations
Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest
to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents
of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report. We
certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication.
The authors agreed the manuscripts get licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License, as indicated in
the Journal of Surgery website.
Funding sources: The authors have no funding sources.
References
- Stuster J. Behavioral issues associated with long-duration space
expeditions: Review and analysis of astronaut journals. 2010.
- Kirkpatrick AW, Ball CG, Campbell M, Williams DR, Parazynski SE, et
al. Severe traumatic injury during long duration spaceflight: Light
years beyond ATLS. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery.
2014; 76: 504-514.
- Garrett-Bakelman FE, Darshi M, Green SJ, Gur RC, Li L, et al. The
NASA Twins Study: A multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight. Science. 2019; 364.
- LeBlanc A, Lin C, Shackelford L, Sinitsyn V, Evans H, et al. Muscle
volume, MRI relaxation times (T2), and body composition after
spaceflight. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2000; 89: 2158-2164.
- Miraut D, Reale G, Illana C, Runge A, Tenajas R, et al. Autonomous
uLtrasound Image improvement SyStEm (ALISSE) for guiding astronauts to take clinically valuable images in future long manned
Space missions. Proceedings of 17th International Conference on
Space Operations, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2013.
- Cucinotta FA, Kim MH, Chappell LJ. Space Radiation Cancer Risk
Projections and Uncertainties-2012. NASA Technical Paper NASA/
TP–2013-217375. 2014.
- Billica RD, Simmons SC, Mathes KL, McKinley BA, Chuang CC, et al.
Perception of the medical risk of spaceflight. Aviation, Space, and
Environmental Medicine. 1996; 67: 467-473.
- Kanas N, Salnitskiy V, Gushin V, Weiss DS, Grund EM, et al. Psychosocial Issues in Space: Results from Shuttle/Mir. Acta Astronautica.
2009; 64: 659-668.
- Komorowski M, Fleming S, Mawkin M. Anaesthesia in austere environments: literature review and considerations for future space
exploration missions. NPJ microgravity. 2018; 4: 1-12.
- Rehn M, Eken T, Krüger AJ, Steen PA, Skaga NO, et al. Precision is
important in prehospital reporting of GCS components: Change in
probability of a severe injury when stratifying level of consciousness. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2018; 26: 91.
- Doarn CR, Mohler SR, Fitzgerald D. Surgical capabilities for the
International Space Station. Aviation, Space, and Environmental
Medicine. 2017; 88: 56-61.
- Williams DR, Baskin DS, Schneider W. Space medicine innovation
and telemedicine: New approaches to health care and research
in extreme environments. In Extreme Physiology and Medicine.
BioMed Central. 2017; 2: 5.
- Kozlovskaya IB, Grigoriev AI, Stepantzov VI. Countermeasure of
the negative effects of weightlessness on physical systems in long-term space flights. Acta Astronautica. 2007; 60: 336-347.
- Stewart LH, Trunkey D, Rebagliati GS, Whelan S. The role of the surgeon in long-duration space exploration. Journal of the American
College of Surgeons. 2018; 227: 173-184.
- Jennings RT, Boyle M. Challenges and priorities for medical education in deep space. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance.
2018; 89: 990-997.
- Williams DR, Firth J, Cavuoti D. The International Space Station:
Medical operations for expedition class missions. Aviation, Space,
and Environmental Medicne. 2009; 80: 491-498.
- Gundel A, Polyakov VV, Zulley J. The alteration of human sleep and
circadian rhythms during spaceflight. Journal of Sleep Research.
1997; 6: 1-8.